Australian regulator sues Apple over alleged iPhone bricking

Reuters:

The U.S. technology giant “bricked” – or disabled with a software update – hundreds of smartphones and tablet devices, and then refused to unlock them on the grounds that customers had had the devices serviced by non-Apple repairers, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a court filing.

And:

The regulator said that between September 2014 and February 2016, Apple customers who downloaded software updates then connected their devices to their computers received a message saying the device “could not be restored and the device had stopped functioning”.

Customers then asked Apple to fix their devices, only to be told by the company that “no Apple entity … was required to, or would, provide a remedy” for free, the documents added.

From the ACCC’s official post on the matter:

The ACCC alleges Apple represented to consumers with faulty products that they were not entitled to a free remedy if their Apple device had previously been repaired by third party, “unauthorised repairers”. However, having a component of the Apple device serviced, repaired, or replaced by someone other than Apple cannot, by itself, extinguish the consumer’s right to a remedy for non-compliance with the consumer guarantees.

“Consumer guarantee rights under the Australian Consumer Law exist independently of any manufacturer’s warranty and are not extinguished simply because a consumer has goods repaired by a third party,“ ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said.

Tricky issue. Do I have the right to repair my own goods, or have them repaired by a third party of my choosing? If I do go the third party route, should Apple be able to void my warranty? Did Apple intentionally brick the iPhones in question? Core questions.

While you chew on that, consider the related controversy concerning John Deere’s tractor repair policies.

And, more recently, the account of the WiFi garage-door-opener seller who bricked a customer’s garage door after a bad review.

Interesting stuff. Welcome to the future.



6 thoughts on “Australian regulator sues Apple over alleged iPhone bricking”

  1. If an iPhone is damaged by the use of a non Apple authorized battery or charger, does (or should) Apple have to pay for the repairs if the phone is still under warranty?

  2. That’s not what’s being claimed here. Apple is disabling the phones via software updates and the repair requested is undoing that disabling. It would as if Ford disabled your car if you got an oil change at Jiffy Lube instead of at a dealership.

  3. Apple isn’t disabling phones because repairs were made. They are closing a security hole. The fingerprint sensor is coupled in the factory with the secure enclave. If they allow any sensor to work, then the only thing needed to decrypt and access a phone would be swapping fingerprint sensors (which happens to also be common when someone repairs screens as it is harder to remove the sensor from the old screen and move it to the new screen). If Apple doesn’t check and ensure the same sensor is in place as was installed in the factory, they open the devices to physical attack. If on the other hand they do check, it makes it harder to repair.

    Lastly, the phones aren’t bricked, but the sensor is just disabled (at least that is how it currently works on iOS 10).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *