Walt Mossberg, The Verge, reviewing a 13-inch Touch Bar MacBook Pro:
Apple is realigning its familiar laptop line, dramatically reshaping and in some ways merging the favorite options for both heavy-duty “pro” users and everyday customers. And the poster child for this more muddled future is the pricey new MacBook Pro
And:
The Pro, once mainly aimed straight at people who do especially taxing work like professional video editing or serious design, is now being stretched to suit a much larger audience.
Thus the term “tweener”.
Walt noted that the MacBook Pro’s battery life was wildly inconsistent:
On my rigorous test, which I’ve used for years, the machine actually exceeded Apple’s claim of up to 10 hours of battery life. The test involves setting the screen at 100 percent, keeping it on and undimmed constantly, playing an endless loop of music, and leaving Wi-Fi on to collect email, tweets, and Facebook posts in the background. Result: 11 hours and 38 minutes.
But then:
I ran a second test with all of Apple’s default energy-saving settings on, the screen at 75 percent and a perfectly normal (for me) mix of tasks like web browsing, email, a few short videos, Twitter, Facebook, some light writing, and Slack. The Pro died at 8 hours and 22 minutes.
To make things worse, Apple’s built-in prediction of how much time the battery had left before dying fluctuated a lot and was mostly wrong (Apple says this is a known problem caused by the fact that modern processors can power up and down rapidly over a much wider range than in the past, making estimates much more difficult.)
Interesting. Hopefully, this will get better over time as Apple collects usage data, gets their arms around the problem.
“The Pro, once mainly aimed straight at people who do especially taxing work like professional video editing or serious design is now being stretched to suit a much larger audience.”
Huh? Is that really an accurate characterization of the MacBook Pro? If anything, it’s the other way around; the TouchBar makes it Pro-ier than ever.
IMHO, that’s true of the Mac Pro (desktop), but the MBP’s always been the “power user’s” Mac portable.
Agree. The MBP has always appealed to more than just the pure “pro” user. Quite a few “prosumers” buy them as well. On the other hand, the Mac Pro, because of its cost, is far to the “pro” end of the spectrum.
And why is there no middle model between Mac Pro and iMac? Because there isn’t actually a niche between the two. No middle ground in the macOS desktop market, thus no need for a ‘tweener desktop machine. The (failed) Power Mac G4 Cube proved that long ago.
There is a niche between the Mac Pro and the iMac. I would call it the Mini Pro – using regular CPUs (i5/i7) and having 4 RAM slots, probably two PCIe slots (32 lanes), etc…
Apple should call it the Mini Cube Pro. This system would easily handle 64GB of RAM … yet for ECC or beyond, one would need the Mac Pro. The Mini Cube would be an actual computer, one may upgrade from time to time.