The spectacular snap was uploaded earlier this week proclaiming the photographic prowess of its flagship P9 smartphone.
Except it wasn’t.
The spectacular snap was uploaded earlier this week proclaiming the photographic prowess of its flagship P9 smartphone.
Except it wasn’t.
I can’t wait for the Samsung copy of the picture…
I have the prior version of both camera and lens. The lens is not the one shown in the article – it’s much bigger and much more expensive than the one pictured. The lens itself costs about 2 grand. Here’s what it looks like:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/680103-USA/Canon_2751B002_EF_70_200mm_f_2_8L_IS.html
Here’s the camera body:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=847545&gclid=Cj0KEQjwte27BRCM6vjIidHvnKQBEiQAC4MzraRcN34Vs9HIoOJ20Q48yoIzl9hEDHyzjjgCER5lhskaArS38P8HAQ&is=DEMO&ap=y&m=Y&c3api=1876%2C92051678642%2C&Q=&A=details
Not exactly a phone.