On Facebook, identity and advertising

Ben Thompson, writing for Stratechery, pulled together an excellent look at what Facebook was and what it has become. A bit of a long read, but full of insight.

This quote from a 2004 op-ed in the Harvard Crimson:

The thefacebook.com scene includes reams of carefully coiffed, immaculately manicured, evening-garbed Harvard students grinning eagerly on page after page as we present our own ideal image of selfhood to fellow browsers…

And this 2009 quote, from David Kirkpatrick’s The Facebook Effect:

“You have one identity,” [Zuckerberg] says emphatically three times in a single minute during a 2009 interview. He recalls that in Facebook’s early days some argued the service ought to offer adult users both a work profile and a “fun social profile.” Zuckerberg was always opposed to that. “The days of you having a different image for your work friends or co-workers and for the other people you know are probably coming to an end pretty quickly.”

This is a core value.

Then, as Facebook grows and your friend list expands over time (this quote from a Bloomberg article):

People have been less willing to post updates about their lives as their lists of friends grow…Instead, Facebook’s 1.6 billion users are posting more news and information from other websites. As Facebook ages, users may have more than a decade’s worth of acquaintances added as friends. People may not always feel comfortable checking into a local bar or sharing an anecdote from their lives, knowing these updates may not be relevant to all their connections.

According to one of the people familiar with the situation, Facebook employees working on the problem have a term for this decline in intimacy: “context collapse.” Personal sharing has shifted to smaller audiences on Snapchat, Facebook’s Instagram and other messaging services.

A fascinating read, all down the line. Nice job, Ben.



3 thoughts on “On Facebook, identity and advertising”

  1. This makes me loath Zuckerberg all the more. His problem is he thinks someone’s identity is public property, and that people don’t have the discretion to share what they choose to share. So his statement is a non sequitur. Objectively we have one identity. But if one chooses to not share with their coworkers than they belong to the local model railroad club, or play Cricket (or, shudder, more embarrassingly, use Linux) or are involved in alien cosplay conventions, that’s their business.

    To assume they shouldn’t have control over such intimate information is typical of sociopathic jerks like him, who only cares about identities in the context of how he can monetize them.

  2. “my ro<? >om mate Mary Is getting paid on the internet 98$/hr”..,……..!wc550ctwo days ago grey MacLaren P1 I bought after earning 18,512 DoIIars..it was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k DoIIars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly payouts..it’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over. hourly 87 DoIIars…Learn. More right Here !wc550:➽:➽:➽➽➽➽ http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsExcellenceGetPayHourly$98…. .❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦::::::!wc550……….

  3. Now imagine if this is about Apple, here and elsewhere fanboyz would be refuting any such arguments. Why do you perpetuate stories without hesitation about other companies not named Apple?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *