The slow death of the TV channel

Chris DeVille, writing for The Verge:

In the music industry, which is also dealing with an influx of infinite streaming options, there’s been a lot of talk about curation. Everyone wants the ability to be the cool friend who filters out the garbage and points people to the good stuff — and to find ways to monetize that ability. It’s how Spotify, Apple Music, and Tidal are striving to differentiate themselves.

TV channels are already adopting that strategy in their own way. The few networks that survive outside the comfort of a bundle will be the ones that mean something to people, that have built up a recognizable point of view. HBO did it first and best. Through a combination of quality programming and savvy branding (“It’s not TV, it’s HBO”), the network built up such fervent loyalty that when it finally launched its own subscription service, its customers followed in droves.

There are clear parallels between the networks and the web. Just as some sites are pure curation, so too are cable bundles. TV networks continue to rely on advertising as a significant source of revenue. As viewers migrate to alternatives like Netflix, Hulu, HBO Now, etc., that advertising revenue shrinks in direct proportion. Web sites built on similar advertising models are feeling a similar pinch, as alternatives spring up on a regular basis. More competition, and much of it free. Advertising revenue plummets.

Is this decline inevitable? Irreversible? Will we hit a point of critical mass when unbundled content is both plentiful enough and cheap enough to take the major networks out of the picture entirely? That critical point will occur when a network’s ad revenue no longer supports the budget for original programming.



2 thoughts on “The slow death of the TV channel”

  1. Cable will survive because they will not give up the cherry picking of programming buy cord cutters.

    Adding channels removed by cord cutters and bundling cost much more than the a la carte preferences of an elite group. Cable will always have the leverage to create more price-friendly packages then any other service. Content providers will not end their love of the cable providers if the cable providers remain in the best position to maintain a certain price hegemony.

  2. Some networks are adapting better than others.

    It’s been interesting to see how different networks implement Web streaming from their own sites, something we’ve grown to rely upon. We’ve been able to follow shows on PBS, ABC, CW, and SyFy. Our DSL bandwidth is a good test of how ungracefully a poorly-implemented stream can fail. The ads are numbingly repetitive, something that almost makes me hanker for 1990.

    But so far, we seem to be covered for a good amount of what we’d otherwise need to rig up the aerial antenna again for.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *