Apple doesn’t have to do jack

Elia Freedman:

Let’s say that together now: the dearth of many viable iOS indie dev businesses is not Apple’s problem.


It’s ours.


Whether we like it or not, the game has changed. Trials are out. They’ve been out for six years now and we have no idea if they are ever coming back. Upgrades are out, too. Again, we have no idea if they will ever come back. Ask yourself, do you really want to sit here and wait another 10 months to find out if we will get trials and upgrades, and then wait another three months after that to see it available? Hell, no. I need to make a living now.


It’s time for us to adapt.

We’ve seen quite a bit of writing regarding this issue over the past week. I’m just a user so I have no idea of the issues involved but it is good to hear from another side of the equation.



21 thoughts on “Apple doesn’t have to do jack”

  1. I disagree Elia. Apple needs to seriously revamp the stores discovery options. There’s no adapting capable of fixing that.

    They are finally giving devs better stats (iTunes Connect us horrible in the current state) so that should help a bit.

  2. Relying on Apple to do everything for you is incredibly presumptious and naiive, and it IS the best app store on earth!

  3. I was nice to you, John, but that was a douchey reply.

    If you are not satisfied with Apple’s store, you have three choices:

    1. Suffer.
    2. Quit.
    3. Do something else, too.

    Pick one.

  4. Obviously, Apple doesn’t have to do anything. There’s no law that says that Apple needs to support good apps on its platforms. That doesn’t mean that it isn’t a terrible idea for Apple to treat its devs the way it does.

    I don’t really understand the point of these “it’s not x’s problem” essays.

  5. I disagree about Marco’s post being in any way right. He’s mixing up two very distinct issues.
    He’s putting the blame for laziness by developers on Apple. It’s not. Those apps aren’t getting updated because the developers are too lazy. period. Apple is not the issue. That Marco can’t understand that shows much about him.

  6. If you are talking analytics like the age, location, gender of the users buying your app and/or its IAP, it’s not going to happen. Apple is too privacy focused.

    And guess what, it’s been like that since day one. No developer should have ever had the expectation of that information and if he/she can’t handle that then why was development ever started.

  7. Elia is a little wrong about something. “Trials are out. They’ve been out for six years now and we have no idea if they are ever coming back. Upgrades are out, too.”

    I don’t believe these were ever in.

  8. One the one had, Apple can do better. But they clearly don’t have to. On the other, it’s business and half is in the making and half is in the telling. At least half is in the telling, usually way more. Small developers don’t tend to be very good at marketing. Sadly some don’t even see the value in marketing. That could be ignored in the early gold rush days. Now it’s more like normal business. Think of the Apple store as just shelving at a massive software store. Getting an app on the shelves is step one. Step two of course is ???. Step three is profit. The ??? step, other than being a South Park underwear gnome joke, is a real thing you have to figure out.

  9. repeat after me — “The App Store doesn’t replace marketing”. it’s a store. it has some lists. thats it. it’s up to YOU the developer to promote, advertise, and market your products.

    just like in every single industry.

  10. how does apple treat its devs terribly?! by making the biggest-paying app store in the history of software?? get real, man…

    marketing your apps is part of YOUR business, not apples. no amount of magical “app discovery” is going to fix that, whatever you think that may be.

  11. No, I’m not talking about those stats. I’m mostly talking about knowing where users come [ie – referrals]. They tell you the primary category but not how people found your app [ex – search, featured in category, featured on main page, etc]. That sort of info would be very helpful.

    Just common info [to web dev at least] to better help w/ app descriptions, etc.

  12. Regardless of how you see Marco’s point, he illustrates clearly a problem Apple has on its hands. Touting massive numbers of apps optimized for iPad is awesome for marketing but not the case in reality [ie – app rot]. Devs go where the money is, right? That’s what I keep hearing here yet devs are abandoning apps purely ’cause they’re lazy? Look behind the curtain.

    In all fairness, Apple has made tremendous leaps in Xcode 6/iOS 8 to FINALLY provide better handling of different screen sizes [it SUCKED up to this point], a better iTunes Connect [http://9to5mac.com/2014/06/03/apple-shows-off-completely-redesigned-itunes-connect-coming-later-this-year/], usable app testing [TestFlight integration], etc.

    So it is getting there but Apple has left devs in the cold for quite a while. Honestly, 8 almost checks off the entire list of needs. I just hope they don’t sit around for another 6 years and think they did enough.

  13. Add one more piece of data to the analytics: device version.

    That kind of stuff not being there is what I mean by not getting the basics right. I can’t answer my bosses question [“Can we drop support for 6?”] without data. The new iTunes Connect needs to hurry.

  14. Apple’s discovery process is weighted in favor of established developers. It’s not their doing, just the way the inertia goes. However, getting rid of meaningless top ten lists would be a fair start.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *