Holy hell, read some of the comments, some of those people have to be “special”.
didn’t the “Dream Team” cover up the logo on jerseys in 92? The corporation of the Olympic is long and old and disgraceful.
Assholes. May their world headquarters be ransacked, and their executives cannibalized (sp?) by a ravenous horde of their North Korean neighbors.
Shameful
Or you know, don’t pull out any phone etc during the ceremony. London was a tad annoying with all the folks talking photos etc
Oh and for the record, not displaying or talking about non sponsors is actually an Olympic committee rule
This is not that big of a deal they are advertisers, Coke wouldn’t like it if the athletes were drinking from Pepsi cups.
They said cover up the logo not, here use this Galaxy instead. Everyone knows what an iPhone looks like anyway, this is nothing.
Exactly. All these stupid fucks can go off that same cliff this idiot writer mentioned.
But Samsung isn’t sponsoring the athletes. They are sponsoring the Olympics.
There’s a difference.
But the athletes are choosing to participate in the olympics, if they felt it could ruin their brand or don’t want to be associate with McDonald’s, Coke or Samsung they could leave.
Nike sponsors jerseys for the NFL, but the players with Adidas deals don’t get to make alterations to the jerseys. Nike sponsors the sport, the players chose to play in it.
But those are their personal phones.
It’s not that being associated with Samsung bothers them, it’s that Samsung isn’t paying them so they don’t get a say in what they do with their personal belongings.
If Coke sponsors it, they provide cups for the athletes to drink from on camera. If an athlete brings their own personal cup that says Pepsi, then Coke shouldn’t have a say in the matter.
Football jerseys are made by Nike and are provided to the players. It’s an NFL rule that they have to wear the official uniform on the field. That’s not the same thing at all.
The Olympics isn’t paying them either, so they don’t have to wear the uniform? Can they wear their own gear?
This has nothing to do with clothing.
No it has to deal with endorsements and sponsorships and the Olympics are endorsing the athletes and Samsung is sponsoring the Olympics.
The Olympics obviously has guidelines for what the athletes wear during competition.
I don’t think they have rules regarding the athletes personal property when they aren’t competing, and I don’t feel that corporate sponsors should be allowed to dictate what people do with their own property on their own time.
I have nothing to do with the Olympics and this concerns me very little. I was just stating the difference between sponsoring the Olympics verses sponsoring the athletes.
I see your point but disagree, it doesn’t matter anyway because the Olympics said no.
No shit! WTH?!?!
Pathetic and not at all surprising.
What the heck is wrong with these people. Shameless copycats that can’t stand their competitor that’s actually doing something…
That’s hysterical!
I was looking for some additional coverage and stumbled on this thread (about Samsung giving away devices during the Summer Olympics):
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-takes-us-backstage-at-the-Opening-Ceremony-for-the-Summer-Olympics_id32753
Holy hell, read some of the comments, some of those people have to be “special”.
didn’t the “Dream Team” cover up the logo on jerseys in 92? The corporation of the Olympic is long and old and disgraceful.
Assholes. May their world headquarters be ransacked, and their executives cannibalized (sp?) by a ravenous horde of their North Korean neighbors.
Shameful
Or you know, don’t pull out any phone etc during the ceremony. London was a tad annoying with all the folks talking photos etc
Oh and for the record, not displaying or talking about non sponsors is actually an Olympic committee rule
This is not that big of a deal they are advertisers, Coke wouldn’t like it if the athletes were drinking from Pepsi cups.
They said cover up the logo not, here use this Galaxy instead. Everyone knows what an iPhone looks like anyway, this is nothing.
Exactly. All these stupid fucks can go off that same cliff this idiot writer mentioned.
But Samsung isn’t sponsoring the athletes. They are sponsoring the Olympics.
There’s a difference.
But the athletes are choosing to participate in the olympics, if they felt it could ruin their brand or don’t want to be associate with McDonald’s, Coke or Samsung they could leave.
Nike sponsors jerseys for the NFL, but the players with Adidas deals don’t get to make alterations to the jerseys. Nike sponsors the sport, the players chose to play in it.
But those are their personal phones.
It’s not that being associated with Samsung bothers them, it’s that Samsung isn’t paying them so they don’t get a say in what they do with their personal belongings.
If Coke sponsors it, they provide cups for the athletes to drink from on camera. If an athlete brings their own personal cup that says Pepsi, then Coke shouldn’t have a say in the matter.
Football jerseys are made by Nike and are provided to the players. It’s an NFL rule that they have to wear the official uniform on the field. That’s not the same thing at all.
The Olympics isn’t paying them either, so they don’t have to wear the uniform? Can they wear their own gear?
This has nothing to do with clothing.
No it has to deal with endorsements and sponsorships and the Olympics are endorsing the athletes and Samsung is sponsoring the Olympics.
The Olympics obviously has guidelines for what the athletes wear during competition.
I don’t think they have rules regarding the athletes personal property when they aren’t competing, and I don’t feel that corporate sponsors should be allowed to dictate what people do with their own property on their own time.
I have nothing to do with the Olympics and this concerns me very little. I was just stating the difference between sponsoring the Olympics verses sponsoring the athletes.
I see your point but disagree, it doesn’t matter anyway because the Olympics said no.