Bill Gates says Apple may need a Surface-like device

Chris Matyszczyk, CNET:

Gates began by being circumspect, saying that the market hadn’t declared this was what it wanted yet, but he said that the idea of Apple having to create a Surface-like device was “a strong possibility.”

“This is a seminal event,” he declared.

Um… no.



12 thoughts on “Bill Gates says Apple may need a Surface-like device”

  1. I think he got that mixed up … Microsoft needs an iPad-like device … which is what they are trying to do with the Surface with Windows RT … Home Professional Enterprise Edition.

  2. That Bill Gates is so funny. I don’t know who’d I pay first to tell jokes: him or Louis CK.

  3. His problem is that he never grew past the stupid stylus thing or is willingly delusional about it. For Gates everything revolves around people writing stuff on the slab. Styluses are for dinosaurs. No one knows how to write anymore.

  4. What he really saying that Apple needs to bring back FingerWorks multi-touch keyboard. That is what Surface is really about.

    Microsoft has also copied MagSafe connector.

    Also Apple needs to have their own Stand built-in.

    Surface Pro won’t beat Air in not a single category.
    By the time it comes out, retina version will devastate it.
    AIr already has USB3 and Thunderbolt, high capacity SSD.

    RT is Tegra 3 processor which is half as fast as A5X. wait till Microsoft sees A6, they will shit their pants.

  5. Unless I missed something that’s happened since the announcement, Microsoft still needs a Surface-like device as well. Ship, or get off the pot!

  6. Gates: “You don’t have to make a compromise” – To me the whole thing looks like a collection of compromises in hopes that someone will like something about it, maybe.

  7. “This is a seminal event”

    I’ll buy that, if we go with the second dictionary definition of seminal.

  8. Another abortive attempt at shoehorning a desktop OS onto a tablet is seminal? Good thing Gates is no longer at the helm.

    The iPad was seminal. It defined a class of machines consumers had been shirking for over decade.

    Hell, Metro is seminal. It introduced a largely smart, efficient touch UI distinct from its competitors. (And then Microsoft, clearly haunted by the specter of Gates, said “This touch UI and its metaphors belong on a desktop, with a mouse!”)

    Microsoft’s… hang on, let me count… sixth attempt at birthing a “no compromises” tablet is not and will not be seminal. The Surface Pro is just the previous failed attempt coupled with a detachable keyboard and an even more unpleasant operating system.

    Kill the Surface Pro and let Metro shine on the Surface. Bam, a seminal moment for Microsoft: They finally ship a no-compromises tablet.

  9. indeed. let’s ship and storm the market before you talk about the other boys and what is selling millions for them

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *