This is a simple way to record a call. Are there laws against recording a call without someone’s knowledge? Now updated with a link to a legal guide.
Legal
Apple no longer has exclusive rights to the “iPhone” name in China
A surprising development after all these years.
Legally forcing someone to use their finger to unlock their phone
The LA Times:
Authorities obtained a search warrant compelling the girlfriend of an alleged Armenian gang member to press her finger against an iPhone that had been seized from a Glendale home. The phone contained Apple’s fingerprint identification system for unlocking, and prosecutors wanted access to the data inside it.
Google accused of enabling photography piracy
Time:
Photography company Getty Images is accusing Google of scraping images from third party websites and encouraging piracy, adding a new wrinkle to the Mountain View, Calif.’s ongoing legal battles in Europe.
Challenge to Google Books declined by Supreme Court
Extinguishing that brief hope. It’s over. Google won, authors nothing.
Jean-Louis Gassée takes on the Burr Feinstein Senate Encryption Bill
Jean-Louis does a terrific job. The whole post is right on, top to bottom.
Microsoft files lawsuit against government to stop “forever” secrecy orders
Microsoft writes about their reasons for this lawsuit, citing both the sheer number of requests forcing silence, but also the endless nature of the majority of them. Good for Microsoft for standing up here.
Led Zeppelin members face trial in ‘Stairway to Heaven’ copyright infringement lawsuit
Did Jimmy Page lift this opening and change it? Possibly. But does the Spirit guitarist deserve the money that Stairway brought in? Up to a jury to decide.
FBI agrees to unlock iPhone, iPod in Arkansas homicide case
Claudia Lauer, writing for the Associated Press:
The FBI agreed Wednesday to help an Arkansas prosecutor unlock an iPhone and iPod belonging to two teenagers accused of killing a couple, just days after the federal agency announced it had gained access to an iPhone linked to the gunman in a mass shooting in California.
Official: Justice Department to withdraw legal action against Apple
Kevin Johnson, USA Today:
The Justice Department is expected to withdraw from its legal action against Apple Inc., as soon as today, as an outside method to bypass the locking function of a San Bernardino terrorist’s phone has proved successful, a federal law enforcement official said Monday.
The FBI’s $15,000 purchase order with Cellebrite USA
A search of the General Services Administration public facing web site for Cellebrite and the FBI reveals a single match, a purchase order dated this past Monday.
Apple wasn’t ‘flouting’ iPhone order, judge says
Interesting behind the scenes on the sparring between Apple and the Justice Department attorneys.
Israeli firm helping FBI to open encrypted iPhone
If Israeli firm succeeds, that won’t be the end of the story, just the end of this chapter.
Bipartisan encryption back-door legislation proposal starts circulating in the Senate
The rumored back-door legislation from the Senate Intelligence Committee has now surfaced. From Reuters:
A bipartisan group of U.S. senators has begun circulating long-awaited draft legislation that would give federal judges clear authority to order technology companies like Apple to help law enforcement officials access encrypted data, according to sources familiar with the discussions.
The law is clear: The FBI cannot make Apple rewrite its OS
Susan Crawford is a Harvard Law Professor and was President Barack Obama’s Special Assistant for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. She lays out exactly why the FBI is wrong in its full court press against Apple.
The rules for Tuesday’s Apple, FBI court hearing are posted
To address the limited space available in the Riverside federal courthouse, as well as other logistical issues, the court has posted a set of what they call Order Setting Procedures.
The main rules are listed in the post, including the one about recording devices.
German court rules against Apple in video streaming patent case
OpenTV successfully sued Apple in Germany, has pending patent lawsuits in the US. This impacts both the iPhone and iPad.
Apple’s reply to the FBI
Technically, the brief Apple filed yesterday is in support of their motion to vacate the FBI’s requested court order. It’s the latest salvo in the back and forth. The post contains some important highlights from the brief as well as a brilliant quote from the conclusion.
Apple celeb photo hacking case: Pennsylvania man charged
From the Department of Justice web site:
A Pennsylvania man was charged today with felony computer hacking related to a phishing scheme that gave him illegal access to over 100 Apple and Google e-mail accounts, including those belonging to members of the entertainment industry in Los Angeles.
Now we know the cost of that particular type of crime.
“Every expert I know believes that NSA could crack this phone”
Counter-terrorism expert Richard A Clarke, in an NPR interview, makes a pretty shocking statement about the FBI’s motives and capabilities.
Apple vs FBI has become a national debate
The New York Times:
“It’s an in-your-face proposition for lots more Americans than the Snowden revelation was,” said Lee Rainie, director of Internet, science and technology research at Pew Research Center.
Terrific piece. This is a rare policy story that is emerging as national water cooler conversation.
John Oliver lays out all the nuance of FBI vs Apple, plus a searing new mock Apple ad
[VIDEO] John Oliver lays out the nuance in the FBI / Apple encryption battle and addresses all the important aspects of the case with his usual biting wit in the video embedded in the main post. And there’s also a deliciously satirical Apple ad that starts at 15:50. Ouch!
How the FBI can bypass the auto-erase protection on the San Bernardino iPhone
An ACLU blog post lays out, in great detail, the process by which the FBI can bypass the auto-erase mechanism on the San Bernardino iPhone 5c. Is this correct? Is the FBI aware of this?
Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance lays out his side of the FBI vs Apple argument
Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance was one of the witnesses who testified before the House Judiciary Committee last week (you can read details of that hearing, taking the side of the FBI.
Yesterday, Vance went on TV to lay out his case on Fox News’ Mornings with Maria. Vance does a solid job laying out his argument and is well worth watching.
Some thoughts on this.
Apple’s Eddy Cue: FBI could make us spy on Americans with iPhone cameras or microphones
[VIDEO] Eddy Cue in a Spanish language interview with Univision, makes Apple’s case against the FBI court order.
Apple and the UK’s Investigatory Powers Bill
The Eclectic Light Company:
The UK government, ignoring almost all the expert technical and legal advice put to it, is pressing ahead with its draconian Investigatory Powers Bill, due to undergo its second reading in the House of Commons in a week’s time. Let us suppose that this Bill, as currently before Parliament, were to come into force as it stands, becoming the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IPA).
Read on to see how this affects everyone, even those beyond the borders of the United Kingdom.
Stanford Law, Stanford Computer Science, others team to file amicus brief backing Apple
Some big names in law and computer science have banded together to back Apple in this fight. Read the post for some highlights from the brief.
Apple lawyer: “There is no middle ground”
Tedd Olson, a partner at Gibson, Dunn, and Crutcher, a primary outside counsel in Apple’s battle with the FBI, spoke with Bloomberg Business about the hearings and comments made by the ex-head of the NSA. A fascinating take.
France could fine Apple €1m unless it hacks smartphones
The Local France:
On Monday, French Socialist MP Yann Galut proposed an amendment to French law that – if passed – would see the US companies punished if they didn’t give French officials backdoor access to terrorists’ phones.
They miss the point. Read the post.
Yesterday’s hearing: Apple’s new best buds
My long, ramblings about yesterday’s Judiciary Committee hearing. Lots to process, all of it interesting (at least to me).