It was all too obvious that Samsung was comparing apples to bananas: Apple’s request for expedited discovery was far more justified (in terms of a need to evaluate the requested material) and far less prejudicial (as Apple only requested products of which samples were already circulating, in the case of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 including 5,000 samples handed out at a Google developer conference) than Samsung’s related motion.

Let’s go right back to Foss Patents. Looks like Apple has the upper hand for now. Funny though, Apple refers to Samsung as “the copyist.”

Samsung has to wait for iPad 3 and iPhone 5, but Apple may have to wait for a preliminary injunction | Foss Patents